Five Bets
Five swipes. One bonus. Beat your bias.
5 swipes + 1 bonus
Swipe the AI future

Swipe right on the future you believe.

Five statements. Swipe right for YES and left for NO. A sixth bonus round checks where you sit—then reveals whether your beliefs beat your incentives.

01
02
03
04
05
Round 1 of 6Main game 1 of 5
Round 01 Make the call Pattern hidden

Would you bet on it?
← Swipe left for NOSwipe right for YES →
Drag the card, tap a button, or use ← NO / YES →
Question 6 of 6 · Bonus round

Where do you sit in the AI game?

This question is not part of the five predictions. It tells the scoreboard which economic seat your answers should be compared with.

★ Unscored bonus question
Final scoreboard

Did you beat your own incentives?

Game result

Bias Buster

Bias game score
0 / 100
OutcomeCalculating
Seat-alignedIndependent
Higher scores reward a mixed thesis and beliefs that resist your own incentives.

How your five predictions split

The hidden stack thesis still appears below the game score.

Round 6 verdict

Biggest bets

Where you broke the pattern

Every counter-signal makes the game harder for your incentives to win.

All 6 rounds

Review the five predictions or change your unscored bonus seat.

01

Hidden belief score

Five binary swipes create the stack thesis. A YES answer maps toward different hidden layers by question, so repeatedly swiping in one direction cannot game the result.

02

Four axes

Questions roll into compute, market structure, value capture and governance. The overall result can hide disagreement between those sub-theses, so each stays visible.

03

Bonus seat round

Question six is unscored. It identifies which economic layer benefits from your market thesis. Perfect or meaningful alignment is a loss; mixture or cross-incentive beliefs win.

What the game was hiding: the five cards came from recurring debates in your recent X feed—whether efficiency expands or reduces total compute demand; whether open and local models cross the useful-quality threshold; whether data, memory, and the agent harness matter more than raw intelligence; whether general agents absorb vertical software; and whether control beats global diffusion. Rising infrastructure demand, dependence on the strongest models, general-agent dominance, and centralized controls point toward labs and infrastructure retaining leverage. Local-model sufficiency, context and workflow moats, vertical ownership, and open diffusion point toward applications. Question six only compares that completed thesis with your economic seat. This is a structured game—not an objective model of the AI economy, a psychological assessment, or investment advice.
Summary copied